Free ATS Resume Checker

Paste your resume and get an instant report on what an applicant tracking system can read: contact details, section headings, keywords, quantified results and the formatting that usually breaks parsers. Add the job description to see which of its keywords you are missing. Nothing leaves your browser.

DOCX and TXT files are read here in your browser. To use a PDF, open it, select the text and paste it into this field.0 / 20,000

Optional. Without a job description you get the parsing and completeness checks. With a job description you also get the keyword match for that specific posting, which is what changes from one application to the next.

Paste your resume above to continue.

The analysis runs in your browser. Your resume is never uploaded, never stored and is gone when you close the tab.How CvEO handles data

What an ATS actually does with your resume

An applicant tracking system is a database, not a reader. Before a recruiter opens anything, your file is parsed into fields — name, contact, one row per job, one row per school, a list of skills. Most rejections that feel unexplained happen in that step, because the parser could not find something it needed. In practice it tries to do four things:

  • Extract contact details, usually from the first few lines. A name and email inside a header, a text box or an image is frequently missed entirely.
  • Split the document into sections by heading. It matches conventional words — Experience, Education, Skills — so "Where I have worked" often produces an empty employment history.
  • Read each role as employer, title and date range. Two columns, tables and timeline graphics are the classic cause of jobs being merged, reordered or dropped.
  • Match the text against the keywords on the job requisition. This is where "tailoring" stops being advice and becomes arithmetic.

How to read your score

The score is the weighted share of the checks below that your resume passes. It is a parsing and completeness score, not a prediction of whether you will be interviewed — no tool can promise that, and the ones that do are guessing. Work top down: fix anything red before you touch anything amber.

  • Contact details — email and phone found in the plain text, not only in a header.
  • Sections — Experience, Education and Skills present under their conventional names.
  • Length — roughly 250 to 1,100 words. Under that reads as thin; well over it gets truncated by some parsers and skimmed by every human.
  • Bullets — achievements as separate lines rather than one dense paragraph.
  • Quantified results — numbers, percentages, money, volume, time saved.
  • Action verbs — bullets that start with what you did instead of "responsible for".
  • Formatting hazards — runs of ALL CAPS, pipe characters and replacement characters, all of which indicate a layout the parser is struggling with.

What this score cannot tell you

Be sceptical of any ATS score, including this one. It is a useful checklist, not a verdict.

  • Each employer configures their system differently. There is no universal pass mark and no single algorithm to optimise against.
  • It reads text. It cannot see whether your file is a two-column layout or whether your headings are real text — paste the text you can select in the PDF, and if you cannot select it, the file is an image and no ATS can read it either.
  • It does not judge whether you are a good fit, only whether the document represents you completely.
  • Keyword coverage rewards overlap with the posting. Overlap you cannot defend in an interview is worse than a gap.

Formatting checklist

Everything here is about surviving the parse. None of it requires a design.

  • One column. No tables, no text boxes, no sidebars.
  • Contact details in the body of the document, not in the page header or footer.
  • Standard section names: Experience (or Work Experience), Education, Skills.
  • Real text, not an image of text, and no text baked into a logo or a chart.
  • A common font and normal casing, with bold for emphasis instead of ALL CAPS lines.
  • Dates in a consistent format, such as "Mar 2021 – Aug 2024", on the same line as the role.
  • Standard bullet characters. Decorative glyphs and icons frequently parse as junk.
  • Save as PDF when the posting allows it and DOCX when it asks for Word. Both parse well when the layout is simple; neither rescues a complicated one.

Before and after

Three rewrites of the kind the checks above ask for. Each keeps the same facts and changes what a parser and a recruiter can do with them.

  • Responsible for the company social media. → Grew the company LinkedIn from 4,200 to 11,500 followers in 9 months, raising inbound demo requests 22%.
  • Worked on improving the checkout. → Rebuilt the checkout flow with the payments team, cutting failed transactions 31% and p95 latency from 900 ms to 210 ms.
  • Helped with onboarding new staff. → Ran onboarding for 14 new hires across two offices, shortening time-to-first-ticket from 3 weeks to 8 days.

What each score band means

80–100 · Strong

The document parses cleanly and is complete. Spend your remaining time on keyword coverage against each specific posting rather than on the format.

55–79 · Fixable

Nothing here is structural, but the flagged items are costing you. Most resumes in this band are missing quantified results, a Skills section, or both.

0–54 · At risk

At least one blocker is likely to stop the resume before a person sees it — most often missing contact details, missing standard sections, or a layout that produced unreadable text.

ATS checker: common questions

What is an ATS resume checker?

It analyses your resume the way employer screening software does — parsing contact details, section headings, keywords and formatting — and reports what could stop it from reaching a recruiter. It is a check on the document, not on your experience.

Is this ATS checker free?

Yes, and it needs no account. The analysis runs entirely in your browser: the text you paste is never uploaded to CvEO and is gone when you close the tab.

How do I make my resume ATS-friendly?

Use a single-column layout with no tables or images, put your contact details in the body rather than the page header, use the standard section names, mirror the wording of the job posting where it is genuinely true of you, and quantify achievements with numbers.

Is there a score that guarantees an interview?

No. Every employer configures their tracking system differently, so there is no universal pass mark. A high score means the document represents you completely and parses cleanly — which is the part you control.

Should I hide keywords in white text?

No. Tracking systems strip formatting before matching, so hidden text is read as ordinary text, and recruiters who notice it discard the application. Put the keywords into real achievements instead.

Which file format should I send?

Whatever the posting asks for. PDF and DOCX both parse well when the layout is a single column of real text, and neither compensates for a complex one. Never send a scanned or exported image — no parser can read it.